JML Prez Says City of Milford 'Could Care Less' About Safety of Kids Who Play Baseball

Junior Major League, the City of Milford and the Oyster Festival disagree about who would be responsible for the $2,000+ annual cost of maintaining a removal fence that the JML wants to install at Fowler Field.


At Monday night's Board of Aldermen meeting, Aldermen members were scheduled to vote on whether or not to approve the Junior Major League’s proposal to install a removable fence at the Benard/Francis Field at Fowler Field.

It's a seemingly simple issue that has become very complicated. One person who doesn't find the issue complicated at all is Junior Major League President George Spescha, who said bluntly, ""My feelings on it is the City of Milford could care less about the safety of the kids who play baseball."

What Kind of Fence?

Spescha's original proposal was for a permanent fence, which the Junior Major League would pay for completely. JML leases the space at Fowler Field from March - November, while the City uses the space for the rest of the year.

It was decided that a removal fence would be needed, so that it could be removed during the Oyster Festival in August and for other events throughout the year. 

The removal fence would cost $17,000, a fee that the Junior Major League would cover, but Spescha objects to JML paying the $2,000-$3,000 cost to remove the fence each year for the Oyster Festival, as well as for any other events throughout the year.

At the Aldermen meeting, City Attorney Jonathan Berchem said, "When this matter was presented to our office, the questions I had was to whether this fence was really, in fact, removal. [It costs] $2,000 for removal. Who would be responsible for the cost to remove the fence? The city should not bear the cost. It's not our fence."

Berchem said that if the fence remained up during the Oyster Festival, it could "create a tripping hazard and cause exposure for the City."

Spescha, who was not present for the Board of Aldermen meeting Monday night, said in an interview Thursday night that he disagrees with Berchem's assessment, calling the idea that the fence would be a hazard during the Oyster Festival "ludicrous."

Attempts were made to contact Oyster Festival for this article. 

Tabling the Issue

The plan for the removable fence was approved by the Parks Department, but denied by the Planning & Zoning Board. 

Aldermen Member Paul Smith said, "Planning & Zoning denied it because they had questions that needed to be answered. If we could just table this until Planning & Zoning gets the answers."

Mayor Blake explained why the Aldermen was addressing a proposal that had been denied by Planning & Zoning: "Once Planning & Zoning takes something up, it is required to come to this board for review."

Aldermen Member Philip J. Vetro asked, "Why would Junior Majors take on the expense of removing the fence when they want the permanent fence to begin with?"

"The City doesn't incur any expenses from our league," Spescha said. "The kids would like to have an outfield fence to try and hit a home run over." 

"I hate to say I've given up, but I don't foresee a happy ending to it," Spescha added. "I've got a lot of other things to do than argue with people who don't really seem to care."

The Board of Aldermen will address the matter of whether or not to allow the removal fence to be built when they reconvene again on Monday, February 4th, 2013.

C.S. January 12, 2013 at 08:44 PM
It would also seem unreasonable for the oyster festival to charge people $2.50 for a bottle of water on a hot summer day, but that never stopped them. Let them pay for taking the fence down and putting it back up, that or leave the fence up.
C.S. January 12, 2013 at 08:45 PM
Hey Pete, you are an asshole.
Pete January 14, 2013 at 04:35 PM
good one
Brian Rowland January 14, 2013 at 09:21 PM
Being allotted 5 or 10 minutes in a public meeting, or a few paragraph news article, is not going to bring any clarity to the issue at hand. So I am not surprised by all the confusion, misconception, conjecture, etc.. found in all these comments. Which perfectly supports the statement which George Spescha made that it appears the City could care less about the kids safety who are playing ball down there. There is a safety issue down there on those fields which he is trying to address and has offered a couple of solutions. It has met tremendous resistance for N number of reasons. I commend him for trying to do the right thing. At this point, I fear he has done all he can in his power. What I will say is that god forbid something does happen... I hope those who have vehemently opposed his ideas, can sleep at night knowing they had an opportunity to be part of the solution, but rather chose to be part of the problem which ultimately resulted in a child being injured.
Marie January 17, 2013 at 12:49 AM
My comment had a error, I left out a word. It should of read one certain person sounds like he has a personal issue WITH Mr Spescha and the game of baseball itself. Sorry for the misprint.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »